@article {481,
	title = {Substrate efflux propensity is the key determinant of iPLA-β-mediated glycerophospholipid hydrolysised},
	journal = {Journal of Biological Chemistry},
	year = {2015},
	month = {2015/02/23},
	abstract = {A-type phospholipases (PLAs) are key players in glycerophospholipid (GPL)homeostasis and in mammalian cells, Ca2+-independent PLA-beta (iPLAβ) in particular has been implicated in this essential process.However, the regulation of this enzyme,which is necessary to avoid futile competition between synthesis and degradation, is not understood. Recently, we provided evidence that the efflux of the substrate molecules from the bilayer is the rate-limiting step in the hydrolysis of GPLs by some secretory nonhomeostatic) PLAs. To study if this is the case with iPLAβ as well a mass-spectrometric assay was employed to determine the rate of hydrolysis of multiple saturated and unsaturated GPL species in parallel using micelles or vesicle bilayers as the macrosubstrate. With micelles, the hydrolysis decreased with increasing acyl chain length independent of unsaturation and modest discrimination between acyl positional isomers was observed, presumably due to the differences in the structure of the sn1 and sn2 acyl binding sites of the protein. In striking contrast, no significant discrimination between positional isomers was observed with bilayers, and the rate of hydrolysis decreased with the acyl chain length logarithmically and far more than with micelles. These data provide compelling evidence that efflux of the substrate molecule from the bilayer, which also decreases monotonously with acyl chain length, is the rate-determining step in iPLAβ- mediated hydrolysis of GPLs in membranes. This finding is intriguing as it may help to understand how homeostatic PLAs are regulated and how degradation and biosynthesis are coordinated.},
	doi = {10.1074/jbc.M115.642835},
	url = {http://www.jbc.org/content/early/2015/02/23/jbc.M115.642835.abstract},
	author = {Batchu, Krishna Chaithanya and Hokynar, Kati and Jeltsch, Michael and Mattonet, Kenny and Somerharju, Pentti}
}
@article {442,
	title = {Structural and mechanistic insights into VEGF receptor 3 ligand binding and activation},
	journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
	volume = {110},
	year = {2013},
	month = {08/2013},
	pages = {12960 - 12965},
	abstract = {Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their receptors (VEGFRs) are key drivers of blood and lymph vessel formation in development, but also in several pathological processes. VEGF-C signaling through VEGFR-3 promotes lymphangiogenesis, which is a clinically relevant target for treating lymphatic insufficiency and for blocking tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. The extracellular domain of VEGFRs consists of seven Ig homology domains; domains 1-3 (D1-3) are responsible for ligand binding, and the membrane-proximal domains 4-7 (D4-7) are involved in structural rearrangements essential for receptor dimerization and activation. Here we analyzed the crystal structures of VEGF-C in complex with VEGFR-3 domains D1-2 and of the VEGFR-3 D4-5 homodimer. The structures revealed a conserved ligand-binding interface in D2 and a unique mechanism for VEGFR dimerization and activation, with homotypic interactions in D5. Mutation of the conserved residues mediating the D5 interaction (Thr446 and Lys516) and the D7 interaction (Arg737) compromised VEGF-C induced VEGFR-3 activation. A thermodynamic analysis of VEGFR-3 deletion mutants showed that D3, D4-5, and D6-7 all contribute to ligand binding. A structural model of the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 D1-7 complex derived from small-angle X-ray scattering data is consistent with the homotypic interactions in D5 and D7. Taken together, our data show that ligand-dependent homotypic interactions in D5 and D7 are essential for VEGFR activation, opening promising possibilities for the design of VEGFR-specific drugs.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, Binding, Competitive, Crystallography, X-Ray, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Humans, Ligands, Microscopy, Electron, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Multiprotein Complexes, Mutation, Protein Binding, Protein Multimerization, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Scattering, Small Angle, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Thermodynamics, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3, X-Ray Diffraction},
	isbn = {1091-6490},
	doi = {10.1073/pnas.1301415110},
	url = {http://www.pnas.org/content/110/32/12960.long},
	author = {Lepp{\"a}nen, Veli-Matti and Tvorogov, Denis and Kisko, Kaisa and Prota, Andrea E and Jeltsch, Michael and Anisimov, Andrey and Markovic-Mueller, Sandra and Stuttfeld, Edward and Goldie, Kenneth N and Ballmer-Hofer, Kurt and Alitalo, Kari}
}
@article {45,
	title = {Structural determinants of vascular endothelial growth factor-D receptor binding and specificity},
	journal = {Blood},
	volume = {117},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2011/Feb/},
	pages = {1507 - 15},
	abstract = {Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their tyrosine kinase receptors (VEGFR-1-3) are central mediators of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. VEGFR-3 ligands VEGF-C and VEGF-D are produced as precursor proteins with long N- and C-terminal propeptides and show enhanced VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 binding on proteolytic removal of the propeptides. Two different proteolytic cleavage sites have been reported in the VEGF-D N-terminus. We report here the crystal structure of the human VEGF-D Cys117Ala mutant at 2.9 {\r A} resolution. Comparison of the VEGF-D and VEGF-C structures shows similar extended N-terminal helices, conserved overall folds, and VEGFR-2 interacting residues. Consistent with this, the affinity and the thermodynamic parameters for VEGFR-2 binding are very similar. In comparison with VEGF-C structures, however, the VEGF-D N-terminal helix was extended by 2 more turns because of a better resolution. Both receptor binding and functional assays of N-terminally truncated VEGF-D polypeptides indicated that the residues between the reported proteolytic cleavage sites are important for VEGF-D binding and activation of VEGFR-3, but not of VEGFR-2. Thus, we define here a VEGFR-2-specific form of VEGF-D that is angiogenic but not lymphangiogenic. These results provide important new insights into VEGF-D structure and function.},
	url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21148085},
	author = {Lepp{\"a}nen, Veli-Matti and Jeltsch, Michael and Anisimov, Andrey and Tvorogov, Denis and Aho, Kukka and Kalkkinen, Nisse and Toivanen, Pyry and Yl{\"a}-Herttuala, Seppo and Ballmer-Hofer, Kurt and Alitalo, Kari}
}
@article {40,
	title = {Structural determinants of growth factor binding and specificity by VEGF receptor 2},
	journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
	volume = {107},
	year = {2010},
	month = {02/2010},
	pages = {2425 - 30},
	abstract = {Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) regulate blood and lymph vessel formation through activation of three receptor tyrosine kinases, VEGFR-1, -2, and -3. The extracellular domain of VEGF receptors consists of seven immunoglobulin homology domains, which, upon ligand binding, promote receptor dimerization. Dimerization initiates transmembrane signaling, which activates the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain of the receptor. VEGF-C stimulates lymphangiogenesis and contributes to pathological angiogenesis via VEGFR-3. However, proteolytically processed VEGF-C also stimulates VEGFR-2, the predominant transducer of signals required for physiological and pathological angiogenesis. Here we present the crystal structure of VEGF-C bound to the VEGFR-2 high-affinity-binding site, which consists of immunoglobulin homology domains D2 and D3. This structure reveals a symmetrical 22 complex, in which left-handed twisted receptor domains wrap around the 2-fold axis of VEGF-C. In the VEGFs, receptor specificity is determined by an N-terminal alpha helix and three peptide loops. Our structure shows that two of these loops in VEGF-C bind to VEGFR-2 subdomains D2 and D3, while one interacts primarily with D3. Additionally, the N-terminal helix of VEGF-C interacts with D2, and the groove separating the two VEGF-C monomers binds to the D2/D3 linker. VEGF-C, unlike VEGF-A, does not bind VEGFR-1. We therefore created VEGFR-1/VEGFR-2 chimeric proteins to further study receptor specificity. This biochemical analysis, together with our structural data, defined VEGFR-2 residues critical for the binding of VEGF-A and VEGF-C. Our results provide significant insights into the structural features that determine the high affinity and specificity of VEGF/VEGFR interactions.},
	url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20145116},
	author = {Lepp{\"a}nen, Veli-Matti and Prota, Andrea E and Jeltsch, Michael and Anisimov, Andrey and Kalkkinen, Nisse and Strandin, Tomas and Lankinen, Hilkka and Goldman, Adrian and Ballmer-Hofer, Kurt and Alitalo, Kari}
}
@article {41,
	title = {Suppressive effects of vascular endothelial growth factor-B on tumor growth in a mouse model of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorigenesis},
	journal = {PLoS ONE},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010//},
	pages = {e14109},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: The family of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) contains key regulators of blood and lymph vessel development, including VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D, and placental growth factor. The role of VEGF-B during physiological or pathological angiogenesis has not yet been conclusively delineated. Herein, we investigate the function of VEGF-B by the generation of mouse models of cancer with transgenic expression of VEGF-B or homozygous deletion of Vegfb. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Ectopic expression of VEGF-B in the insulin-producing β-cells of the pancreas did not alter the abundance or architecture of the islets of Langerhans. The vasculature from transgenic mice exhibited a dilated morphology, but was of similar density as that of wildtype mice. Unexpectedly, we found that transgenic expression of VEGF-B in the RIP1-Tag2 mouse model of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorigenesis retarded tumor growth. Conversely, RIP1-Tag2 mice deficient for Vegfb presented with larger tumors. No differences in vascular density, perfusion or immune cell infiltration upon altered Vegfb gene dosage were noted. However, VEGF-B acted to increase blood vessel diameter both in normal pancreatic islets and in RIP1-Tag2 tumors. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Taken together, our results illustrate the differences in biological function between members of the VEGF family, and highlight the necessity of in-depth functional studies of VEGF-B to fully understand the effects of VEGFR-1 inhibitors currently used in the clinic.},
	url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21124841},
	author = {Albrecht, Imke and Kopfstein, Lucie and Strittmatter, Karin and Schomber, Tibor and Falkevall, Annelie and Hagberg, Carolina E and Lorentz, Pascal and Jeltsch, Michael and Alitalo, Kari and Eriksson, Ulf and Christofori, Gerhard and Pietras, Kristian}
}
@article {22,
	title = {Signalling via vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 is sufficient for lymphangiogenesis in transgenic mice},
	journal = {EMBO J},
	volume = {20},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001/Mar/},
	pages = {1223 - 31},
	abstract = {Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 (VEGFR-3) has an essential role in the development of embryonic blood vessels; however, after midgestation its expression becomes restricted mainly to the developing lymphatic vessels. The VEGFR-3 ligand VEGF-C stimulates lymphangiogenesis in transgenic mice and in chick chorioallantoic membrane. As VEGF-C also binds VEGFR-2, which is expressed in lymphatic endothelia, it is not clear which receptors are responsible for the lymphangiogenic effects of VEGF-C. VEGF-D, which binds to the same receptors, has been reported to induce angiogenesis, but its lymphangiogenic potential is not known. In order to define the lymphangiogenic signalling pathway we have created transgenic mice overexpressing a VEGFR-3-specific mutant of VEGF-C (VEGF-C156S) or VEGF-D in epidermal keratinocytes under the keratin 14 promoter. Both transgenes induced the growth of lymphatic vessels in the skin, whereas the blood vessel architecture was not affected. Evidence was also obtained that these growth factors act in a paracrine manner in vivo. These results demonstrate that stimulation of the VEGFR-3 signal transduction pathway is sufficient to induce specifically lymphangiogenesis in vivo.},
	url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11250889},
	author = {Veikkola, T and Jussila, L and Makinen, T and Karpanen, T and Jeltsch, M and Petrova, T V and Kubo, H and Thurston, G and McDonald, D M and Achen, M G and Stacker, S A and Alitalo, K}
}
@conference {653,
	title = {Signalling via VEGFR-3 is sufficient for lymphangiogenesis in transgenic mice.},
	booktitle = {Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics: Discovery, Biology, and Clinical Applications},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001/10/29/},
	address = {Miami Beach, Florida},
	author = {Jussila, L. and Veikkola, T. and Jeltsch, M. and Thurston, G. and McDonald, D. and Achen, M. and Stacker, S. and Alitalo, K.}
}
