<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cardiovascular System on Michael’s Domain</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/cardiovascular-system/</link><description>Recent content in Cardiovascular System on Michael’s Domain</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Michael Jeltsch.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:18:18 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/cardiovascular-system/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Do fish have difficulty breathing?</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/fish/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/fish/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Fish are breathing with their gills, but this is literally, for many of them, only half of the story. The difficulty of extracting oxygen from water is the single most defining force that shapes fish evolution. Land animals are mostly exposed to the same oxygen concentration, but fish need to operate in waters of vastly different and rapidly changing oxygen content. Moreover, water contains much less oxygen than air, and the diffusion of oxygen in water is magnitudes slower than the diffusion of oxygen in air. Therefore, fish evolution was forced to come up with creative ways to&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Do fish have lymphatics?</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/piscine-lymphatics/</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/piscine-lymphatics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Read the whole back story in our preprint: 
 &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.2119.v1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.2119.v1&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
. It isn&amp;rsquo;t easy to believe that the scientific community cannot agree on whether zebrafish have a lymphatic vascular system. Zebrafish is one of the most successful model organisms in biology, and one would assume that we know its overall vascular setup. However, starting with W. Vogel in 1981 (
 &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1981-5-627" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1981-5-627&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 ), many fish physiologists subscribe to the notion that there are no lymphatics in fish, and most contemporary fish physiology textbooks have appropriated this point of view. At the same time, solid publications from multiple labs show that lymphatic vessels exist in fish (
 &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1427" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1427&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
, 
 &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.026" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.026&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 ). What is going on? When the Yaniv lab published in 2022 that embryonic lymphatics in zebrafish can transdifferentiate into blood vessels (
 &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04766-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04766-2&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 ), it suddenly appeared possible to unite the two contradictory views. In a nutshell: In most fish, an embryonic lymphatic system transdifferentiates during development into blood vessels that form a specialized subcompartment of the cardiovascular system (the so-called secondary vascular system). The degree of transdifferentiation seems quite variable between fish species, and some vessels - notably the thoracic duct - might retain a hybrid phenotype.As so often is the case in top journals, the original article by Das et al. neither discussed the 100-year-old controversy nor the ramifications of its landmark findings. Even though Kari Alitalo and I did so in a short commentary (
 &lt;a href="https://rdcu.be/cOjJ0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;https://rdcu.be/cOjJ0&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 ), more space is needed to do justice to the topic. Although the controversy about piscine lymphatics is far from settled, it appears important to record the current status of the discussion in the scientific literature. Moreover, we wanted to describe a high-likelihood consensus model against which to plan future experiments. The result is an extended review; we hope you&amp;rsquo;ll enjoy reading it. If you find something that you don&amp;rsquo;t like, by all means, let us know! Especially if you can back up your critique with data or sound arguments. We sent the manuscript for review and are happy to improve it based on your input.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>