<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comparison on Michael’s Domain</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/comparison/</link><description>Recent content in Comparison on Michael’s Domain</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Michael Jeltsch.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:18:18 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/comparison/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Showdown: GE Healthcare's Äkta versus Bio-Rad's NGC</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/showdown_ge_healthcare_s_kta_versus_bio_rad_s_ngc/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/showdown_ge_healthcare_s_kta_versus_bio_rad_s_ngc/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been purifying proteins since 1996. I worked on an Äkta Explorer until 2015, when we upgraded to the 
 &lt;a href="https://www.cytivalifesciences.com/en/us/shop/chromatography/chromatography-systems/akta-avant-p-06264" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;Äkta Avant&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
. In 2020, my lab moved, and we inherited a 
 &lt;a href="https://www.bio-rad.com/en-fi/category/ngc-medium-pressure-liquid-chromatography-systems" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;Bio-Rad NGC&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
, which we have been using now for 2 years.We encountered many problems with the Bio-Rad NGC. At first, I thought that this might be normal when switching systems. I expected the problems to disappear one by one. After all, we also had problems when we switched from the Explorer to the Avant.However, even after two years and dozens of purification runs, the problems with the NGC don&amp;rsquo;t seem to stop. Whenever ẃe solve a problem, a new, previously unknown problem appears. And differently to GE Healthcare, Bio-Rad&amp;rsquo;s customer service is not even close to what we have experienced with GE Healthcare. When our IT could not connect the Äkta to our university&amp;rsquo;s network, GE Healthcare sent an engineer from their Munich crew to Helsinki to fix the problem. Appreciating the learning curve, GE Healthcare also offered free participation in one of their courses for somebody from our team. And their support was not limited to the warranty period! They really wanted us to be happy with their device. We don&amp;rsquo;t experience the same amount of support from Bio-Rad. It always feels like we have to coerce them into solving the problems we have with the NGC, and their response time is well below any customer expectations.This is the first of several blog posts about Äkta versus NGC. I hope will find the time to write in more detail about all our issues over the next few months.We decided in 2015 that we finally needed a new FPLC. Our Äkta Explorer was reaching end-of-life, and we had received about 100k funding to renew the FPLC of our 
 &lt;a href="https://b3p.it.helsinki.fi" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;core facility&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
. The device was expensive enough that we needed to go through the official tendering process (at the time, the limit was 30,000 €, but it has been increased to 60,000 € by now). There were only two contenders: The Bio-Rad Discover NGC and the GE Healthcare Äkta Avant. The Bio-Rad was cheaper (82,810 € versus 95,470 €), but we decided to purchase the GE Healthcare device. One important reason was that all our users had been using the Äkta Explorer and its Unicorn software. Switching would simply be disruptive and require lots of support and time from our side. However, there were also technical reasons that made us prefer the Äkta over the NGC:Äkta Avant&amp;rsquo;s advantages&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Kapa HiFi excels, Phusion works sort-of, Q5 and Platinum SuperFi disappoint</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/kapa_hifi_excels_phusion_works_sort_of_q5_and_platinum_superfi_disappoint/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/kapa_hifi_excels_phusion_works_sort_of_q5_and_platinum_superfi_disappoint/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My last 
 &lt;a href="https://www.neb.com/products/e5520-nebuilder-hifi-dna-assembly-cloning-kit" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;NEBuilder assembly&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 got stuck because I couldn&amp;rsquo;t get two of the PCR reactions to work. I needed one small fragment and two ~3-kb-fragments. I needed to insert a 2A-sequence in between the small and one of the 3-kb-fragments and thus added the necessary sequences as tails to the primers. The template was not especially GC-rich, nothing too complicated, but only the small fragment did amplify in my first attempt. When also my second attempt failed to amplify the 3-kb-fragments, I decided to try out some alternative polymerases. For cloning purposes, I have been using exclusively Phusion High Fidelity DNA polymerase (from 
 &lt;a href="https://www.neb.com/products/m0530-phusion-high-fidelity-dna-polymerase" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;New England Biolabs&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 or from 
 &lt;a href="https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/F530S" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;ThermoFisher&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
) for the last years, but maybe there was something better and more robust? I received three different free samples for testing: 
 &lt;a href="https://www.kapabiosystems.com/product-applications/products/pcr-2/kapa-hifi-pcr-kits/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;KAPA HiFi HotStart&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
, 
 &lt;a href="https://www.neb.com/products/m0491-q5-high-fidelity-dna-polymerase" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;NEB Q5® High-Fidelity&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 and 
 &lt;a href="https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/12351010?ICID=search-product" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;ThermoFisher Platinum SuperFi™&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
. My graduate student did the PCRs yesterday and I ran the gels today. From the gel quality, you can see that I don&amp;rsquo;t have much routine anymore, but the overall results are quite clear and in the future, our go-to polymerase for tricky templates will be KAPA. I think KAPA&amp;rsquo;s proofreading capabilities are a bit below Phusion, but I do not care if 2% instead of 0.5% of the DNA products contain a mutation.In the attached PDF file, you can see, that my grad student included two more samples for the Phusion polymerase, where she used the same conditions, but a different template (supercoiled plasmid instead of linear DNA). Surprisingly, the Phusion polymerase did a much better job to amplify from supercoild DNA than from (the same) linear DNA; I cannot explain that…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>