<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cycle on Michael’s Domain</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/cycle/</link><description>Recent content in Cycle on Michael’s Domain</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Michael Jeltsch.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:18:18 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/cycle/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cyclical PhD production</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/cyclical_phd_production/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/cyclical_phd_production/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was wondering why recently nobody graduated with a PhD from our lab. My first (and wrong) conclusion was, that our lab is not as productive anymore as it used to be. When I looked at the data carefully I discovered an interesting phenomenon: The PhD production rate in our lab follows a 5-6 year cycle. And lo and behold: The cycle is about to peak again in 2013/2014, which is exactly what I expect to happen as many of our PhD students are about to finnish this or next year. I wonder whether this is specific for Kari Alitalo&amp;rsquo;s lab or whether this a general phenomenon. In any case I am looking forward to all those parties (&amp;ldquo;karonkka&amp;rdquo;) that lie ahead.The figure above shows the number of PhDs received any given year that were supervised by Kari Alitalo averaged over a window of one or three years. Shared supervision was counted as 0.5.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>