Education on Michael’s Domain

Back to the monograph?

Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Finland had become internationally known for producing highly qualified PhD graduates in the STEM fields. This was a result of the requirement to publish 4 to 5 scientific manuscripts in renowned scientific journals. Not surprisingly, it took, on average, about seven years to accomplish that feat. Today, Finnish PhD graduates are perhaps internationally more known for being relatively old once they graduate. I myself was 34 years old when I received my doctoral hat . It took me a bit less than six years.On the other hand, my supervisor was so smart to let me do what I wanted, and I spent quite a bit of time with side projects that did not really advance me on my trajectory towards the degree certificate. However, it also meant that I acquired skills, knowledge, and connections that I otherwise would not have. If you take the 10000-hours-rule literally, 10000 hours equal pretty much a six-year PhD education.At the moment, the Finnish Ministry of Education wants to lower the time required for achieving the PhD goal down to 3 years. This article in World University News is to date the most extensive English information piece that has surfaced about this project.My questions are: Why? and How? The why is pretty obvious: Finland has fallen behind in the OECD statistics of highly educated professionals. To polish these numbers, Finland needs more PhD graduates. And since attention-span-reduced politicians cannot be expected to wait six years, it is only logical that they would agree to spend money to increase the degree numbers, provided this would happen fast.But what about the how? How can PhD students learn in 3 years what they normally used to learn in 6 years? If that were possible, it would mean our current PhD education is massively inefficient. Can we squeeze it down to three years without compromising quality? There is clearly an opportunity for optimization. Especially when it comes to the funding of the studies. There has been a constant lack of university-salaried PhD positions. As a consequence, many PhD students spend a significant chunk of their time applying for grants or - even worse - working part-time in order to make ends meet. However, while absolutely a step in the right direction, paying a salary will not cut down the required time by 50%.There is something annoying about science that politicians might not fully understand: It is impossible to predict the outcome of scientific experiments. This very fact is the only reason you do them in the first place! However, if you cannot predict the outcome of experiments, you cannot predict how long it’ll take to get the work done and publish the results. In order to straight-jacket the process of obtaining a PhD degree into a three-year predictable journey, we need to dig deeply into our academic bag of tricks and resurrect the “monograph”. The monograph is an alternative way to attain a PhD degree. Although alive on paper, it had practically died in the STEM fields decades ago, with more than 99% of all STEM PhD theses being publication-based. In some fields and faculties, the monograph has held on to a higher share, but its popularity has been diminishing everywhere for very good reasons. But now it is back!With the monograph, you don’t open up your scientific output to the scientific community for peer review, improvement, and appreciation (in the form of citations). Instead, you write up your research results in a hundreds of pages thick manuscript that is only scrutinized by your supervisors and two external experts appointed by the faculty council. What could possibly go wrong? I hope that I am wrong, but a three-year PhD education will likely not be able to offer the same as a six-year PhD education. Besides, there are other factors that unnecessarily slow down PhD education, which are not addressed in the current pilot. The most notably ignored factor is the supervisor-to-student ratio. Due to the sustained relative decrease in the funding of the basic university functions, teachers and supervisors at Finnish universities are already very thinly stretched, and the current “suboptimal” supervisor-to-student ratio will deteriorate with 1000 additional PhD students who will enter Finish universities over the next year. I fully understand the desire to harmonize the PhD degree at the European level (something that we have done more-or-less successfully with the BSc and MSc degrees starting with the Bologna process in 1999). We don’t know many of the implementation details for this pilot yet. But very clearly, most of the real stakeholders were never asked when this pilot had been cooked up.UPDATEThere have been two articles in the Finnish daily newspaper “Helsingin Sanomat” about this pilot that talk about the two most important points of criticism that have been targeted at the 1000-PhD-students project, namely the decrease in PhD education quality that seems to be inevitable and the very unequal distribution of the funding between different disciplines: https://www.hs.fi/politiikka/art-2000010217525.html https://www.hs.fi/kaupunki/art-2000010242698.html UPDATEThe University of Helsinki has finally posted some information about the upcoming call. The page is not available from the news feed, but you have to know what you are looking for in order to find it. This his is counterproductive given the fact that the application period is only two weeks: https://www.helsinki.fi/en/research/doctoral-school/doctoral-education-pilot

The Finnish 1000 PhDs pilot

Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0000

The Finnish government is going to finance 1000 additional new fully funded doctoral positions, which would start in the academic year 2024/2025.The money (85000€/year for each PhD student) will be competitively distributed between Finnish universities, and some of that money will be used to pay for the salary of the PhD students for three years. Perhaps one of the triggers for this initiative is that Finland has been falling behind in the OECD statistics in the number of highly educated workers. The question is whether this one-time expense will really increase the level of education or only boost the numbers.The average duration of a PhD education is around seven years in Finland. In order to pull off a 3-year PhD education at such a large scale, it is expected that the requirements for the PhD will be lowered. As a matter of fact, the requirements have already been lowered, but further “easings” might still come. Together with these, universities are aiming to streamline the kafkaesque absurd and medieval administration process, which can easily take half a year from the time of completing the last manuscript to receiving the actual PhD certificate.Many other outlets have reported about this pilot; here’s one that is available also in English: https://acatiimi.fi/2023/11/28/for-once/Although most people are happy about the additional money, almost everybody is sceptical to some degree. Good intentions are not enough, and there are many serious issues with this pilot:

Doing research without deep knowledge

Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0000

Dear Professor Jeltsch,My name is Shahid, and I am studying Medicine. I am interested in molecular biology and biochemistry. Sadly, my curriculum does not include many modern molecular biology research techniques. Still, I want to learn about this area to the extent that makes me comfortable putting forward a hypothesis and a possible treatment for a disease. My goal would be to test this hypothesis with the help of a research team of molecular biologists and other experts. Therefore, I don’t need deep knowledge. With this letter, I am asking a professional researcher like you to point me to resources that would allow me to acquire the necessary expertise for such an endeavor. What would be suitable books or materials to study? I should also mention that I have access to all the significant scientific publishers via our university library.Thanks for our assistance,ShahidI received the above request via email a few months back. I always encourage students to go beyond what the curriculum offers. That is not to say that a good “run-of-the-mill” education does not enable you to be part of a productive team. But without going beyond the curriculum, it isn’t easy these days to have any lasting impact on anything. So far, so good. The red flag in the above email is this sentence: “Therefore, I don’t need deep knowledge.“When treating most diseases, low-hanging fruits have been picked. There are two approaches when trying to reach the high-hanging fruits:

Strike at the University of Helsinki

Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000

A strike warning has been issued for tomorrow (28.2.) for the University of Helsinki. The reason is that the negotiations about between the employers and employees about the wages and working conditions are stuck and the strike is used as a means to speed up the movement of the employer’s negotiation position towards an acceptable compromise. Business as usual? After all, there hasn’t been a strike at the university for a very long time…While almost everybody agrees that Finland’s future is built on knowledge and innovation, the appreciation of the very people that are generating knowledge and innovation seems to have hit an all-time low if appreciation is reflected by working conditions and payment levels.I guess the underlying cause is not so much the concrete offerings of the employer (or the lack thereof), but the disregard and disrespect for academic education, research, and development that has been growing over the years, accelerated by the 2015-elect government, which refuses to invest into the future. Universities should not behave like companies trying to maximize their profit on the cost of their employees and the quality of their product. With some exceptions , everybody with a little bit of self-respect is participating. All major unions, including the students’ and professors’ union, are supporting this action. Apparently, professors will go on strike for the first time in the history of this country ( https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/finnish_professors_walk_out_in_first-ever_strike/10095355 ).

The Heart Beats on the Left

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0000

The heart points to the left and most people’s heart is about one-third right, two-thirds left. I just joined the Finnish Social Democrats ( SDP ). I had seriously contemplated joining the German Socialdemocratic party (SPD) in 1994, but I happened to leave Germany because of a DAAD scholarship I received. Shortly after I had moved to Finland, Germany managed to get rid of its conservative government. Gerhard Schröder replaced Helmut Kohl as federal chancellor and started moving things which Kohl had been afraid to touch for 16 years. I think a country, in which the son of a cleaning lady and a single mother can work up his way to become head of the government, is principally ok.A major reason for joining the SDP was also my dissatisfaction with the present Finnish coalition government, that stubbornly keeps refusing to invest into Finland’s future: into the education of our kids. The cutbacks in the budgets from kindergartens to universities show an unprecedented ideologic egoism for a short-term balanced budget, which is unprecedented among all Scandinavian countries.The good thing about the SDP (and the German SPD) is that there is more room for different opinions than in most other parties.