<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Nature on Michael’s Domain</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/nature/</link><description>Recent content in Nature on Michael’s Domain</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Michael Jeltsch.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:18:18 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/nature/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Bullying from the top</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/bullying_from_the_top/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/bullying_from_the_top/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some numbers from the Nature 2019 graduate survey (
 &lt;a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03535-y" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03535-y&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 ) are discomforting. Very few of the respondents were from Finland, and therefore the aggregate from Finland has to be taken with a grain of salt. But every single incidence is one incidence too much. What worries me most is a) that bullied PhD students in Finland feel that they cannot speak out about their experiences without repercussions, and b) that bullying from the top might be more prominent in Finland as opposed to bulling from peers (if one includes other academic staff into the &amp;ldquo;top&amp;rdquo;). One student reportedly experienced bullying from the programme director (which falls under &amp;ldquo;other&amp;rdquo;, which was not separately listed by Nature in the graph). Numbers do not add up to 100% due to rounding and multiple mentionings.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Angiogenesis landmark publications</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/angiogenesis_landmark_publications/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/angiogenesis_landmark_publications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;According to Nature, our 
 &lt;a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/276/5317/1423.long" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;Science paper from 1997&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 is a landmark paper for the angiogenesis field: *&amp;ldquo;A paper establishing the role of VEGF-C and VEGF-R3 signaling in lymphangiogenesis. A new field is born.&amp;quot;*The collection of landmark papers for the angiogenesis field from the last 80 years (
 &lt;a href="http://www.nature.com/focus/angiogenesis/classics/vegf.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;http://www.nature.com/focus/angiogenesis/classics/vegf.html&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
) was published first in 2003 and unfortunately has not been updated to include later seminal studies. However, until today, most of these 86 papers are still must-reads for every PhD student in the angogenesis field.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>