<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>New Service Organization on Michael’s Domain</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/new-service-organization/</link><description>Recent content in New Service Organization on Michael’s Domain</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Michael Jeltsch.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:18:18 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/new-service-organization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>No interest (in retrospection and introspection)?</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/no_interest_in_retrospection_and_introspection/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/no_interest_in_retrospection_and_introspection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There was much talk about last years 
 &lt;a href="https://www.helsinki.fi/en/news/the-university-of-helsinki-terminates-570-employees-and-incorporates-continuing-education-activities" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;“changes”&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 at the university. Surprisingly, nobody seems to be interested anymore in the topic. At least this is the impression that I first got, when I went to the public hearing event at the Meilahti campus. The lecture hall 1 of Haartman Institute, where the hearing was supposed to take place, was completely empty when I arrived. Because only a handful of people had bothered to show up, the hearing had been moved to a table in the nearby Cafeteria. Hardly noticed by anyone, a review group has started its work to analyze the &amp;ldquo;changes&amp;rdquo; at the University of Helsinki, which took place during the last one and a half years. I guess the idea was to figure out what preventable mistakes have been done. According to 
 &lt;a href="https://flamma.helsinki.fi/fi/HY359046" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;this university source&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
, Jukka Kola, who is the public face for many of the controversial decisions during this period, got to decide himself about the members of the review group. Because of this, the review group will have to be very careful not to appear biased in their report.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>