<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Student Assignments on Michael’s Domain</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/student-assignments/</link><description>Recent content in Student Assignments on Michael’s Domain</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Michael Jeltsch.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:18:18 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/student-assignments/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>It’s difficult to grade student’s assignments</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/grading/</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/grading/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been reading hundreds of student assignments this autumn. In many of these assignments, the students are expected to answer questions. Grading these assignments means deciding whether the answer is &amp;ldquo;right&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;wrong&amp;rdquo;. This is sometimes difficult. Most answers are somewhere between &amp;ldquo;right&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;wrong&amp;rdquo;. Therefore, the need for grading exposes a deeper problem: Before I can decide where on the spectrum from &amp;ldquo;right&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;wrong&amp;rdquo; the students&amp;rsquo; answers fall, there needs to be an objective &amp;ldquo;right&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;wrong&amp;rdquo;. Otherwise, objective grades are an illusion to begin with (not even considering the problem of how to determine them reliably).However, all our scientific knowledge is preliminary. It is subject to modification or even reversal when new, better data becomes available. So, how can one grade any assignment with any certainty? Luckily, not all of our knowledge is equal. One important hallmark of a scientific statement is 
 &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;falsifiability&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
, a concept that was perhaps first popularised by the science philosopher Karl Popper in his book 
 &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Logic_of_Scientific_Discovery" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;The Logic of Scientific Discovery&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
. What are examples of scientifically falsifiable theories?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>