<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>VEGF-E on Michael’s Domain</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/vegf-e/</link><description>Recent content in VEGF-E on Michael’s Domain</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Michael Jeltsch.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:18:18 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jeltsch.org/en/tags/vegf-e/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>OMG: T. rex did not have VEGF-B!</title><link>https://jeltsch.org/en/omg_t_rex_did_not_have_vegf_b/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeltsch.org/en/omg_t_rex_did_not_have_vegf_b/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our work on the evolutionary origin of the PDGF and VEGF growth factors has just been published in &lt;em&gt;Angiogenesis&lt;/em&gt;: 
 &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-023-09874-9" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-023-09874-9&amp;nbsp;






 
 
 
 &lt;svg class="svg-inline--fa fas fa-up-right-from-square fa-2xs" fill="currentColor" aria-hidden="true" role="img" viewBox="0 0 512 512" overflow="visible"&gt;&lt;use href="#fas-up-right-from-square"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
. We analyzed both PDGFs and VEGFs, but our focus was naturally on the VEGF side of things. It&amp;rsquo;s just a coincidence that the PDGFs happened to be a subgroup of the VEGFs and not vice versa, but that&amp;rsquo;s of course just our biased point of view :-)Since we do lymphatic research, we can proudly announce that the phylogenetic oldest VEGF likely resembled VEGF-C and featured the enigmatic silk homology domain. It makes intuitive sense (and had been proposed before by Jörg Wilting), because the most simple vascular systems that we know of are the so-called hemolymph systems (e.g., in insects), which share many features with the lymphatic system.With this publication, we did not do something exceptional that only a few can do. We did something everybody could do but nobody had done so far: looking systematically at which animals have which PDGFs and VEGFs. Actually, we did something new: we developed a crowdsourcing method for classifying PDGFs and VEGFs. Instead of asking people, we asked databases. There are many PDGF-like and VEGF-like sequences in databases, which are only recognizable as such by the homology of their amino acid sequence. In order to know whether we are dealing, e.g., with a VEGF-C or a VEGF-D, we are running many (PSI)BLAST searches, and then we tally up the majority opinion (as determined by the top hits).Many surprises waited for us after the bioinformatics script had finished its job after two weeks of finding and comparing PDGF- and VEGF-like sequences:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>